www.psychspace.com心理学空间网2020-2021
Elizabeth Conradt — University of Utah
Ian Krajbich — The Ohio State University
Nicole Landi — University of Connecticut
cG!d:^W]|1[-d0
Clayton E. Curtis — New York University
Andrea Halpern — Bucknell University
Brad Wyble — The Pennsylvania State University
2018-2019~.w1xY;`e$C P4}0心理学空间&P0vb$q~1o-G9]Steven Franconeri – Northwestern University 视觉认知;数据可视化;STEM(科学、技术、教育和数学)中的视觉空间思维;图形理解;视觉传达;分析和证据的有效交流。
h
b@Z;z"@K0Qob0
Cynthia F. Moss – The Johns Hopkins University 空间知觉、注意力、学习和
记忆的机制,指导人类和其他动物的行为和在自然环境中航行的系统。
心理学空间SJC&E0z?C
R Shayna Rosenbaum – York University, Canada 神经心理学、脑-行为关系。在《当代生物学》上报道了一个罕见的选择性病变的研究,位于海马内的大脑结构中的一种齿状回,与新脑细胞的发育密切相关,并在区分相似的记忆中使它们被编码为单独的踪迹。
njh6{zt7k |$W0
\X/g/ty4tR0
Melissa Glenn — Colby College研究集中在有助于认知和
情绪行为的神经系统的协调功能是如何在精神疾病中失调的,以及它们是否可以通过营养维持物质得到增强和保护。关注必需的营养胆碱,他们是神经递质乙酰胆碱的前体。胆碱是发育中的一种有效的表观遗传因子,它在围产期的对神经组织和行为的可用性、改变动物对环境的反应有直接的影响。并导致注意力、记忆和
情感方面的终身增强
心理学空间eE$`U
}"q'BCS
?V?k5\*{n0 Paula Niedanthal — University of Wisconsin威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校我最近的研究旨在揭示情绪表达和沟通的
文化起源,并解释世界各地的情绪误解。理论依据取决于长期历史迁移的异质性与同质性的概念,这些概念是根据某一国家或地区殖民化(约500年前)开始之对当前人口的贡献而定义。在一个社会中,迁徙史应该影响社会中面部表情的形式和功能,因为实质性的迁移和最小的迁移对一个国家的沟通和行为预测构成了迥然不同的社会挑战。初步的实证结果支持了这种预期:我们首先表明,高异质性国家的个人与历史上同质国家的个体相比,显示了有利于情绪表达的规则
心理学空间o(d*oe
s H^;Ug&k/|心理学空间\0D1G$s+r6j Kiran Soma— University of British Columbia, Canada 研究方向:行为
神经科学、神经内分泌学、神经行为学、老化、饮食、运动、免疫
心理学空间0Qg;F8{!J心理学空间Dp`N2R~心理学空间t'a|_2|\WP)R3s'K,L0心理学空间.S8b Hk I/~DEY7PcA#iH6Gz0 Koraly Perez-Edgar宾夕法尼亚州立大学心理学副教授,研究领域为,气质和
精神病理学的关系。具有极端气质特征的行为抑制和害羞
儿童社交
焦虑的风险增加。注意机制的个体差异在改善或加剧这些潜在的脆弱性方面可能起着重要的作用。她的下一个项目将研究生命的头两年中对威胁的关注,并利用移动眼动跟踪技术观察幼儿的社会行为。
{U8JgC?:~4B `uG02016-2017心理学空间9HE
T#ti1EoFge.C
F;t)EWF0 Barbara L. Fredrickson北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校商学院的杰出心理学教授、积极情绪与心理生理学实验室主任。荣获2016~2017年度
詹姆斯卡特奖。她是
积极心理学研究领域的领军人物,积极心理学之父马丁•塞利格曼评价她是“积极心理学领域的天才”。中文译著有《积极力》、《积极情绪的力量》、《爱的方法》。
/]C
v |/Zlv(x r0心理学空间9tMa"DF.z/P{hk2W"o
Aaron S. Benjamin
心理学空间DEmb5@ a5qUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
6X.])nU+QS{O q0心理学空间&w9L^SG0n1mDespite the fact that research into the cognitive processes and procedures underlying eyewitness identification has a history nearly as old as that of empirical research on memory more generally, there has been a surprising — and unfortunate — lack of cross-fertilization between the two domains. This set of circumstances has had negative repercussions for both fields: Laboratory researchers concerned with basic problems of human memory often overlook important societal problems that should play a role in shaping agendas for basic research, and applied researchers often failed to consider basic principles of human learning and memory in drawing conclusions from their own work. Many of the failures of generalizability and reliability identified in a recent National Academy of Sciences report,Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification, can be partially traced back to this artificial division between applied and theoretical work on human memory.心理学空间Kx!e Q_2k2g
心理学空间Ef'@'wm"bThe goal of research in my lab at the University of Illinois is to bring basic empirical and computational research on human learning, memory, and decision-making to bear on applied problems. From our perspective, the research that has the most applied potential is not necessarily the work that bears the most superficial similarity to the real-world situation to which it is being applied. Rather, it is the work that has the greatest potential to generalize to a wide range of situations and circumstances, including the real-world scenarios that inspire that work. During my sabbatical, I will be developing a program of research on eyewitness memory — a new domain of interest in my lab.心理学空间(|/JOo8a ~\.L