COLLABORATIVE THERAPY:RESPONDING TO THE TIMES
作者: mints / 11438次阅读 时间: 2011年6月01日
www.psychspace.com心理学空间网

5vnC{w$Ru d0

References心理学空间%nye!S_8v

Anderson, H. & Gehart, D. (Eds.). (2007). Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference. New York: Routledge.心理学空间P#Z.v.x3i)b

Anderson, H. (2005). The myths of “not-knowing.” Family Process. 44(4):497-504.心理学空间&n7uP6f:{w

Anderson, H. (1997). Conversation, language and possibilities: A postmodern approach to therapy. New York: Basic Books.心理学空间C_/q7w{.WX

Anderson, H. & Goolishian, H. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Evolving ideas about the implications for theory and practice. Family Process 27:371-393.

*iC[;lt%Nq0

Anderson, H. & Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is the expert. In K. Gergen & S. McNamee (Eds.) Therapy as Social Construction (pp. ) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

$K nJ L3`;b0

Anderson, H. & Jensen, P. (Eds.). (2007. Innovations in the reflecting process: The inspiration of Tom Andersen. London: Karnac Books.

.I/N9wJ/s,B2L0

Anscombe, G. E. M. & Anscombe, E. (2001). Philosophical investigations: The German text with a revised English translation 50th anniversary commemorative edition. Malden,MA: Blackwell Publishing.

!e'f @r _7HkkTh0

Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech, genre and other late essays (W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

~4laGS9Vz0

Bennington, G. (2003). Politics and friendship: A discussion with Jacques Derrida. Retrieved November 24, 2007, from http://www.hydra.umn.edu:80/derrida/pol+fr.html心理学空间7z3y%LMH

Edwards, D. (2005). Discursive psychology (pp. 257-273). In Handbook of language and social interaction (K.L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.). Erlbaum. P.心理学空间0u$F{]1ZQ

Gadamer, H-G. (1975). Truth and method. New York: Seabury.

K8ka T2u/i$_t(u0

Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

3a;{;kGP0|0

Goolishian, H. A. & Anderson, H. (2002). Narrative and self: Some postmodern dilemmas of Psychotherapy (pp. 217-228). In D.S. Fried Schnitman & J. Schnitman (Eds.). New paradigms, culture and subjectivities New York: Hampton Press.

'V#|;[[ sU+H0

Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

1V0k[?\G4?t0

Holmquest, M. (1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.心理学空间&q-RZ G4P7bC,i E

Lyotard, J-F. (1984) The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press.心理学空间3`(rL4?wJ)rS3blY

MacGregror, R. Ritchie, A. M., Serrano, A. C., Schuster, F. P., McDanald, E. C. & Goolishian,

9lS6s#r}-y0

H. A. (1964). Multiple impact therapy with families. New York: McGraw-Hill.心理学空间8J4O%sW7S0o)Z2|

McNamee, S. & Anderson, H. (2006) Expanding organizational practices: Lessons from therapeutic conversations. AI Practitioner, August 2006.心理学空间#_:l$YJvM)H

Rorty, R. Shawver, L. On Wittgenstein’s concept of a language game. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from http://users.california.com/~rathbone/word.html.心理学空间0D!j4bXd

Shotter, J. (2005). Wittgenstein in practice: His philosophy of beginnings, and beginnings, and beginnings. London: KCC Foundation. 心理学空间p7sG@0r;B#rQ

Shotter, J. (2004). On the edge of social constructionism: ‘Withness’-thinking versus ‘aboutness’-thinking. London: KCC Foundation.

O oR&tl!m0

Shotter, J. (1984). Social accountability and selfhood. Oxford: Blackwell.

j5q0d.Z6QId#PDj0

Vico, B.Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought & language. Trans. Newly revised by Alex Kozulin. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations

+M lv/Fu4kg'J!O.c0

Endnote

LY2MSeA:ST0

1In discussing Wittgenstein’s language game psychologist Lois Shawver (http://users.california.com/~rathbone/word.htm) quotes him, “. . . the term 'language game' is meant to bring into prominence the fact that the 'speaking' of language is part of an activity, or form of life.” Continuing, she suggests that language game “refers to models of primitive language that Wittgenstein invents to clarify the working of language in general. . . .The idea is that if we think in terms of language games, that is, if we ask how our language games are taught and how they are used, then we will begin to see past certain myths in our culture that trap us in misleading pictures of language processes and communication.  Getting past these pictures will enable us to see human psychology with fresh eyes, but what we see with fresh eyes is not predetermined.  Wittgenstein does not tell us what we will see.  He simply helps us see past these ancient pictures because, quoting Wittgenstein, “A 'picture' held us captive. And we could not get outside it, for it lay in our language and language seemed to repeat it to us inexorably.心理学空间F8h've[PI

 

7s$l8JE s0

1@-yOt'GNLi#Dy0 心理学空间V)Dx2u?;uc j

 

9F&zg8}1g P9N{%f0

[i] An earlier version of this article appears in The Blackwell Handbook of Family Psychology (2009) M. Stanton & J. Bray (Eds.). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.心理学空间9ub&so vT,g

 心理学空间"a0b$zv K`MJ

[ii] Though this article focuses on therapy, the assumptions on which it is based have applicability across disciplines and practices, and across a variety of human systems regardless of the designated system, the number of people in it, or their relationship with each other—this includes systems such as education, research and combinations of people called organizations and communities (Anderson & Goolishian, 1988; Anderson, 1997; Anderson & Gehart, 2006).

z'eB8yF)y@Z1xZ0

 

T7{;au{"M0

[iii] For detailed descriptions of what we learned from clients and the shifts in our clinical work, please see Anderson, 1997, chapters 3 and 7).s

7zx!b'_y-c(k#KK%z0
www.psychspace.com心理学空间网
12
«Harlene Anderson 賀琳·安德森Harlene Anderson
《賀琳·安德森Harlene Anderson》
哲学立场:治疗师的立场、专业知识与责任»
查看全部回复