Helene Deutsch, an emigré psychoanalyst known for her theories of feminine
psychology
Source: Paul Roazen, Helene Deutsch: A Psychoanalyst's Life (Garden City, NY:
Anchor Press, 1985).
Helene Deutsch in 1967
When a woman’s longing to be a mother is not gratified by children of her own,
and when she seeks a substitute by the most natural method, namely, adoption,
the question arises as to why she has no children of her own. In the course of
our discussion we have met various types of women who long for children but are
unable to gratify this longing directly, owing to unresolved psychic conflicts.
We have seen the midwife who out of fear of the biological functions was obliged
to content herself with presiding over the delivery of other women’s children,
and Unamuno’s Aunt Tula, who despised sexuality to such an extent that she could
gratify her ardent motherliness only by exploiting the sexual service of other
women. We have seen the androgynous woman who withdraws from female reproductive
tasks and yet wants to create and shape a human being after her own image, and
the woman whose eroticism has remained fixed in homosexuality and whose yearning
for a child derives from the profound source of her own mother relationship.
Many such women renounce men, but gratify the wish for a child by adoption. . .
.
The largest proportion of adoptive parents, however, is recruited from among
sterile married couples. Here the psychology of the adoptive mother is largely
determined by the psychologic motives for sterility (if any) and by the woman’s
reaction to her renunciation. Has her fear of the reproductive function proved
stronger than her wish to be a mother? Is she still so much a child that she
cannot emotionally and consciously decide to assume the responsible role of
mother? Is she so much absorbed emotionally in other life tasks that she fears
motherhood? . . . Does a deeply unconscious curse of heredity burden all her
motherly wish fantasies? And, above all, has the sterile woman overcome the
narcissistic mortification of her inferiority as a woman to such an extent that
she is willing to give the child, as object, full maternal love? . . . .
We must not forget that in such cases adoption constitutes an attempt to remedy
a severe trauma, and that this trauma must be overcome before motherliness with
its gratifications can fully develop. What kind of trauma it is, and the woman’s
reaction to the necessary renunciation of the hope of giving birth to a child,
depend very much, as we have seen, upon the cause of sterility. The emotional
difficulties of adoption may originate in the very conditions that have led to
sterility, and the ghosts that were supposed to be banished by the renunciation
of the reproductive function can under different circumstances re-emerge in the
adoptive mother in a new form. The fear “I cannot have a child” will, for
instance, assume the form. . .“The child will be taken from me.” The adopted
child can become the bearer of all the problems that have led to sterility, as
well as of those that normally pertain to a child of one’s own. The only
difference is that here the conflicts have a more real background. . . .