The Therapist and Postmodern Therapy System: a Way of Being with Others
作者: HARLENE ANDERSON / 6468次阅读 时间: 2010年7月16日
标签: HARLENE
www.psychspace.com心理学空间网The Therapist and the Postmodern Therapy Systemand the Postmodern Therapy System: A Way of Being with Others1 
e tXG+d~p*U0HARLENE ANDERSON, PH.D. 心理学空间m!kY)L@_

3Gv5cb1q'L0心理学空间1z&u eN?!wQd;I#C3y
6th Congress of the European Family Therapy Association and 心理学空间 D Ss-bk;{ Eo+f
32nd Association for Family Therapy and Systemic Practice UK Conference 心理学空间&CUk5n"cb
Glasgow, Scotland 
+F K)gA4qw#c:N@-|/o0October 5, 2007 心理学空间MCXBwf

R @H!nPZ0心理学空间:Ndm-IvB p [r
“Your attitude towards your life will be different according to which understanding you have.” 
3f8n.D!Du1b0Suzuki 
0l7BF|V d+Tr0“. . . not to solve what had been seen as a problem, but to develop from our new reactions new socially intelligible ways forward, in which the old problems become irrelevant.” 心理学空间 I/`'m5Sf
Shotter 心理学空间 Fi&Ei O oq
“Problems are not solved but dissolved in language.” 
+v2o-y5bp!BH6B0Anderson & Goolishian 
心理学空间'iug\9zZuRL

?:^`W,h&@0Our world is shrinking as globalization and technology catalyze social, cultural, political, and economic transformations. Alongside these transformations is an ever-increasing spotlight on (1) democracy, social justice, and human rights, (2) the importance of the people’s voice, singular or plural, and (3) the necessity of collaboration. People increasingly want to have input into what affects their lives. People are losing faith in rigid institutions and their practices--where they are treated as numbers and where their humanness is ignored or worse yet violently violated. People are demanding systems and services that are more flexible and respectful of their needs. These contemporary local, societal and global shifts, the unavoidable complexities inherent in them, and the effects they have on our individual and communal lives and on our world challenge us as practitioners to reassess how we respond. This conference and today’s theme “Self and System” is a timely response to this challenge. 
$AG+TPD!cC jo0心理学空间%e} cA"Ai ~n
心理学空间 A\V+v*?"L\7`o
My response is situated in the broader dialogical movement  in the social sciences and represents over 25 years of evolving thought and practice and a special interest in understanding the  nature of successful therapy  from the client’s perspective. Always on my mind is this question: “How can our theories and practices have relevance for people’s everyday lives in our fast changing world, what is this relevance, and who determines it?” 
e"Art\]x~/Y0
(xl/RPs$y&~]I0
-Uem1oG8BS01 I dedicate this to the memory of Tom Andersen. 心理学空间 }SxM.M ~

&\BNlcS U0心理学空间kwZ_"[4Drf2Q
I situate my response in  postmodern assumptions—and find that a growing community of therapists is increasingly becoming more curious about and interested in the usefulness of these assumptions for therapy. Other therapists in this community whose work you are familiar with and is somewhat similar are: Tom Andersen, Lynn Hoffman, Jaakko Seikkula, and Peggy Penn though they might not refer to themselves as postmodern. (As well, it shares common ground with narrative and solution-focused therapies). 心理学空间*X$w]#Oo#cyx1SL
心理学空间4|cq[h4h
Why do I favor the term postmodern and what do I mean by it? I use it because it as an umbrella term to cover a set of assumptions that I find valuable. Postmodern is a complex set of abstract assumptions that form a framework or perspective for the way we think about, create, use, and privilege knowledge. The central challenge of postmodernism is a call to reexamine and seek alternatives to the fundamentals of knowledge. 
6HZR{[ qi0心理学空间 V&hTfNzH3ZMV
Assumptions 心理学空间 ?1? P'u2d3i.XLK

_G6Cn'zP{x0LY0. The importance of maintaining a skeptical and questioning attitude toward knowledge in the form of grand or meta-narratives and universal truths which we have inherited. 心理学空间XsNl.zD? `n
. The impossibility that grand narratives or universal truths can be generalized or have applicability across peoples, cultures, or situations. 
Mb#Y2ow T |/]C0. The importance of local knowledge – the knowledge, expertise, truths, etc. that is created within a community of persons who have first-hand, personal understandings of themselves and their situation. 
!l#cn/F1x nW&{%{0. Knowledge is an interactive process in which all parties contribute and what is created is unique and has relevancy and usefulness for that community of persons. 心理学空间6O^d(h ?O^6x
. Knowledge cannot be literally discovered or passed on to another person. 心理学空间M$dwt\3{2~W
. Language, in its broadest sense—any means we use to try to communicate, articulate with ourselves and with others--is the vehicle through which we create knowledge. 心理学空间 l^[ Xm
. Language, therefore, is viewed as active and creative rather than as static or representational. 心理学空间/|e/L4P_
. Knowledge and language are relational and generative. 心理学空间M!Q5b&I(y.P*gx
心理学空间mjF ~&yt

Op g&GNF0. Transformation is inherent in the inventive and creative aspects of knowledge and language--dialogue. The transformation is unpredictable as dialogue itself is unpredictable. 
sP1C8i h5u3_0心理学空间*I)nUpkw&?1`
These assumptions do not suggest that postmodernism is an oppositional perspective, for instance, that our inherited knowledge (e.g., psychological theories) should be, or can be for that matter, discarded. The emphasis is on not taking these for granted and not assuming they hold universal truth. Nor do they suggest that postmodernism is a metanarrative or meta-perspective. Inherent in a postmodern view is a self-critique of postmodernism itself. Neither does postmodern define a school of therapy. Instead, it offers a different language, a set of assumptions useful for those of us whose work if often referred to as dialogical or conversational.(Andersen, Hoffman, Seikkula, Penn) 
H3e!g'c8F z M7C Q0心理学空间9m(p3f.|4H.ig
How do these assumptions influence the way that I think about the therapy process, and the client’s role and my role in it? 
lp4^)_tL2@[;B0
lQ;DcP6f"PF0Collaborative Relationship and Dialogical Conversation 心理学空间D0LZ/]+H#}+zZ/d

(HC5qT ]K+K0 First, the assumptions that I mentioned about knowledge and language inform and form the kinds of relationships and conversations that I prefer to have with others. I refer to these as collaborative relationships and  dialogical conversations心理学空间!uc`3CVDv*^

qFu R!U;M9]0Collaborative Relationship 心理学空间 n8iS |1x
心理学空间Bb`[2q-yo0Pd ?
. A particular way in which we orient ourselves to  be,  act, and  respond “with” another person that invites the other into  shared engagement,  mutual inquiry, and joint action. 
6z`*b#r'? ?H|0O0. The responses of people in conversation with each other create the context for their relationship. 
C&kuyr&Ki,hf0. A relationship in which people  connect  and  create  with each other. 心理学空间 g^`FP@7H
. A social activity—a partnership community and  process—in which all members have a sense of participation, belonging and ownership. 
P0W7HQD:D S'X0. The “self” cannot be separated from the relationship systems which we are a part of, have been a part of, and will be a part of. Dialogical Conversation 
r ^%?.Z!zV0. A particular kind of talk in which participants engage “with” each other (out loud) and “with” themselves (silently)—in words, signs, symbols, gestures, etc.—in a mutual or shared inquiry about the issues at hand: jointly responding (commenting, examining, questioning, wondering, reflecting, nodding, gazing, etc.). (commenting, examining, questioning, wondering, reflecting, nodding, gazing, etc.). 
U.N B:R)y['Y0. A process of  trying to understand the other person. 心理学空间\6{n{l5z*m
. Understanding is an (inter)  active process not a passive one. 
.C7^0_Q6q.ZZ0. Understanding requires responding to  connect and learn rather than knowing another person and their words from a theory. 心理学空间l;N(WD d-P%L;r
. Learning about the  uniqueness of the other and noticing the not-yet-noticed. 心理学空间i'~v~,V2P#E&]
. Developing  local understandings that come from within the conversation. 
DN?,[^eC8fvS/\0. Cannot know another person or their circumstances beforehand. 
1{K.SVO b+BL.M-N0. Cannot know the outcome beforehand. 心理学空间ZQm#o)s
. Knowing ahead of time (i.e. categories, theoretical scripts) can inhibit our ability to learn about the uniqueness and novel—to see the familiar in an unfamiliar way. 
oboe9hZ$O*ob0. An always  becoming,  never-ending process. 
Z%h2G,e`K#T$r0心理学空间 _xK"A-r1T
Philosophical Stance 心理学空间)Z`.` w_D7m Q
心理学空间[ku&Y{rZzR
Second, I view my assumptions about collaborative relationships and dialogical conversations as expressions of a  philosophical stance:a way of being
q,oV$~;b Y1j j0心理学空间V;m!utvfc0e
The philosophical stance is the heart and spirit of my collaborative approach. It is a posture, an attitude, and a tone that communicates to the other the special importance that they hold for me. Notably, it reflects a way of beingwithpeople, including ways of thinking with, talking with, acting with, and responding with them. The significant word here is with: a “withness” process that is inherently more participatory and mutual and less hierarchical and dualistic. 
r ?;`2hm HX0
Z|#Ny7E0{;~.Y0The stance communicates to the other that they are a unique human being, not a category of people, and that they are recognized, appreciated, and have something to say that is worthy of hearing. It invites the other to participate with them. In holding this belief, connecting, collaborating, and constructing with others become authentic and natural actions, not techniques. I am reminded that Imelda McCarthy asks us to always “treat the lives of those we work with as precious.” 心理学空间,] VY m YS~

8D7quv!a%DK0In living the philosophical stance, connecting, collaborating, and constructing with others become authentic and natural processes, not techniques or methods. (say more here) And, importantly, for practitioners, the philosophical stance becomes an expression of a value, a belief, or a worldview that does not separate professional and personal. mportantly, for practitioners, the philosophical stance becomes an expression of a value, a belief, or a worldview that does not separate professional and personal. 
6`Pidn\2VkV(UL0心理学空间%y2dpx,Gz
How do these set of assumptions about knowledge and language orient me and translate into my performance within and outside the therapy room. 心理学空间$Y%l$g#_'I,[&o
心理学空间2y,N2`!iK
Conversational Partners 心理学空间4e y0]pU#vf6c7I
心理学空间|X"Jm9Z XF
. A particular way in which we orient ourselves to  be,  act, and  respond “with” another person that invites the other into  shared engagement,  mutual inquiry, and joint action—into dialogue心理学空间s_%DF,mYBj

3M@ A,x~+ej0. As Mikhail Bakhtin said dialogue is the condition for the emergence of new meaning: what is the condition for dialogue? 
6`@}s(@0
%v1NHD5Q9b0. The therapist invites the client into this partnership by taking a learning position through 
[_ g(wlV W0
o2y'm!B.dBN0  . Making room for and  giving the client the choice to tell their story in their manner and at  their pace心理学空间0efe#H(XZ5k)y
  . Being  genuinely interested and curious about the client’s story. 心理学空间5^t zd)yj+P%z
   . Listening and responding attentively and carefully 心理学空间.H:rr3mx CB
   . Responding to understand from their . 
w-U(u5z/r2cE!\0   . Trying to respond in a way that relates to  what the client is saying (not what you think they should be saying). 心理学空间$L e9upg&R
   . Responding is an  interactive two-way process心理学空间$o{WO,uh\t
   . Noticing how the other person responds to your response before continuing. 心理学空间 _;UXl @ gc
   . Paying attention to their  words and their  non-words
b"yv*{#TQDs0   . Keeping in mind that we are always  interpreting/translating another’s words and non-words. 心理学空间GUn h*}K6_/ew2C
   . Checking-out to see if you have heard what the other wants you to hear 
7r[/f9t~]y(gDL1FG0   . Pausing and  allowing silences—space for listening and reflecting. 心理学空间t%I:B*BZTm^+T
   . Allowing each person to  choose what peaks his/her interest and invites them into inner and outer conversation (not what you think they should choose). 心理学空间K2k3Io|3wL`

/_+{$qB lnQ}c0
8o)B(cmv*l&_$C0Story ball metaphor 心理学空间q&j$V3`n3D(J
心理学空间Qb(m%F~H,_#Bf g
. This  therapist learning one-way process begins to slowly shift to a two-way process of  mutual inquiry in which client and therapist begin to engage with each other in looking into the client’s story, their world, and their way of being/living in their world. 心理学空间 AZ'PI.n

#N Z$fi2V K4mTc0. Through this joint action, the  client-therapist relationship and conversation determine the process or method, the process or method does not define the relationship and the conversation. 
0xq*n'gx0心理学空间 n"nx| eG]8irm
. Creating  from within the present relationship and conversation in the moment, as each moment unfolds, not from outside it ahead of time. 心理学空间*K1br:Dk#^.BT+w*Nh+a

6@9f IcirV1l0. Experience the  richness of different voices, and each as poly-vocal, holding multiple, and sometimes simultaneous contradictory thoughts. 心理学空间@r'X-ta^

8d1plg!}W0. Not striving for consensus. 
Y&y!s o]2A&}i$zH%\0
i!W'G/lW}-wAH)h5F{0Relational Expertise 心理学空间~7Wgu&]#^.I
心理学空间-nh`sxE
. Both client and therapist bring an expertise to the encounter. 
Y[&r*J$k+Up G0– Client as expert on themselves and their world. 
tSUyV;ESg0– Therapist as expert on a process and space for collaborative relationships and dialogical conversations. 心理学空间~d7F#^1r&T
– The therapist does not control the direction of the conversation. 
xcSGZC_0– Client and therapist together shape the story-telling, the re-telling, the new telling. 
Y~0v5BI"e0A0
h!yWSA-q'M f$l0. The focus on the expertise of the client does not deny the expertise of the therapist 心理学空间})O${u$WS
  It is simply to call our attention to and not loose sight that the client has a wealth of expertise on his or her life and 心理学空间t Fs#B&VkA
  To caution us to not value, privilege and worship the expertise of the therapist as a better knower of the client’s life and how it should be lived 
wb\\7NH(E:e [0than the client does. 心理学空间 Y9p(V.soT!fX QE
  We have far too long operated in a therapist-centered therapy world. 心理学空间w,_.l8sx5ZDm
心理学空间&W'@,pzE,x:Ir
. The therapist of course has an expertise – it is however, from my perspective a different kind of expertise that many therapists value. 
$n XN,? J7IT"g0. A very difficult concept for some therapists to grasp because it is too different 心理学空间.Fz;G.JU;N
心理学空间xb$U(Xd {;S j
Not-Knowing 心理学空间 X6]C#{Mc,^

1qD Y'Wcg#M X0. The way that we think about the construction of knowledge. 心理学空间8Vhda[}k4e7T
. The intent with which we introduce 心理学空间'O|*APVEb HC#mZ
. The manner in which the therapist offers and uses knowledge. 
W9?\ q5J0心理学空间)T(j2[HU @*g
Being Public 心理学空间9K/K'LQ@8m%{7b
心理学空间(In ne_+YS L&JE
. Inner talk is not invisible talk in the sense that it needs to be seen Living with Uncertainty 
6Wl6~Rg0. Always speaking an ambiguous and different language that as Bahktin suggests always comes peopled with other’s intentions and meanings. 
;Qpxt(AO1m5d*FA$F0. Spontaneous talk does not include pre-structured questions. 
9_-m+N5uK0. Spontaneous, endless shifts and possibilities (thoughts, actions, meanings) emerge from the process. 心理学空间#y*P+}6@!t"z&Yq-T;]Yk
. Striving for a goal or outcome is therefore not the aim. 心理学空间sWp]Qk$xA n
. Transformation occurs in the space in between. 
l$Tej.p*X0
.N.a2I5G"q${{_0Mutually Transforming 
E{6Ia7O!fvD Y0心理学空间L+A p)]+?.Y8]*BT |
In my early writings stressed the mutuality of the therapy process for both the “self” of the client  and the therapist. 
#dc_ u/D0
P)~/MWG n _/Koz4t$P0The therapist is as much at-risk for change as is any member of the process – not passive – or one-sided – not a unilateral process. 心理学空间&bkmB?Q ^
心理学空间Q,e0_$rCcT
Therapy is an active process for both the client and the therapist. It is not passive – or one-sided – not a unilateral process. 
b-xI/b5lq R0r0
&O~-e|D-HU0The therapist is as much at-risk for change as is any member of the process – not passive – or one-sided – not a unilateral process. 心理学空间TB;D3] g6l#LG;W_
心理学空间.x'C/Kl+o&D8yM
A postmodern collaborative perspective is often missed-understood to inform a passive, receptive therapist position. This is not the case. 心理学空间0fB'z'V#L0|

%Gt6c:Ia5c#Z0The therapist is actively involved in a complex interactive process (of continuously responding) 
8b S6xFFU6A l0心理学空间o1p D q|"@4y|0`
There is no such thing as a “no response” or “lack of response” – what may appear as such is simply one kind of response which like with any response, the receiver interprets, translate 心理学空间VUQC1k,q
心理学空间H Pkyg#G z
Everyday Ordinary Life 心理学空间K{SO pA~
. Life is a social event. 
| ]G"fH.g)J)d0. Therapy is a social event. 
/[9F3Aj;yQ2F1e&n0心理学空间 ND(~P ^0me
If a therapist assumes such a philosophical stance, they will naturally and spontaneously act and talk in ways that create a space for and invite conversations and relationships in which clients and therapists “connect, collaborate, and construct” with each other (Anderson, 1992, 1997). Because the philosophical stance becomes a natural and spontaneous way of being as a therapist, theory is not put into practice and there are no therapist techniques and skills, as we know them. Instead, the characteristics give emphasis to a set of values and their implications for action. In other words, the philosophical stance is the “tone” of collaborative relationships as suggested above: a particular way in which we orient ourselves to be, respond, and act with another person that invites the other into a shared engagement and joint action—the process of generative dialogue and transformation (Anderson, 1997, 2003). 
@/B g%Y:_};zO gc!z0
Dvc*d'D$O0act and talk in ways that create a space for and invite conversations and relationships in which clients and therapists “connect, collaborate, and construct” with each other (Anderson, 1992, 1997). Because the philosophical stance becomes a natural and spontaneous way of being as a therapist, theory is not put into practice and there are no therapist techniques and skills, as we know them. Instead, the characteristics give emphasis to a set of values and their implications for action. In other words, the philosophical stance is the “tone” of collaborative relationships as suggested above: a particular way in which we orient ourselves to be, respond, and act with another person that invites the other into a shared engagement and joint action—the process of generative dialogue and transformation (Anderson, 1997, 2003). 
#M2{Gj5Z0心理学空间8j0\ZY \QgVn
“The concept of subjectivity refers to the way in which the person comes to be known and understood by others, that in turn affects the way in which we come to think about and understand our 'selves' in that relational context. If you like, subjectivity is the social category of personhood, and it is a multiple social process with each person coming to have many different and often fragmented subjectivities. The relation between different subjectivities, and the way in which powerful subjectivities may come to be a totalisingdescription of the person, is a complex process. The concept of intersubjectivity  refers to this complex relational field in which the subject and specific  subjectivities come to be created and shaped, and as I noted in the last  chapter, it is all in a territory that is irredeemably social.”心理学空间\2ftH%Fny_ CO|
Hermans
心理学空间8ne%`5W9X Q Q_
REFERENCES 心理学空间6q&RK3f"TPbOZ'I

k?l0Np!y:K6Mv0
#\gf/E[0Anderson, H. & Gehart, D. (2007) Collaborative Therapy: Relationships and Conversations that Make a Difference. New York: Routledge. 心理学空间Z9k.M~\s
Anderson, H. (1997) Conversation, Language and Possibilities: A Postmodern Approach to Therapy. New York: Basic Books. 心理学空间+??[]en
Coming in December 2007: International Journal of Collaborative Practices 
hT7W_.|_`6P0www.psychspace.com心理学空间网
TAG: HARLENE
«贺琳·安德生与她的后现代合作治疗 賀琳·安德森Harlene Anderson
《賀琳·安德森Harlene Anderson》
合作取向治疗:对话·语言·可能性»
查看全部回复