A Perspective on Judgment and Choice
作者: Daniel Kahneman / 7106次阅读 时间: 2012年9月01日
来源: American Psychologist 标签: Kahneman
www.psychspace.com心理学空间网

{f_"^-IZ6v9`7_[0A Perspective on Judgment and Choice心理学空间_WX:LbO c4sy

心理学空间hc;p A_CM

Mapping Bounded Rationality

{t^|(b1k]0心理学空间0}:I?&aL{

Daniel Kahneman

$RXL9^3M0

0C|FV }:B4U$Uv(s;]0Princeton University心理学空间 |.XsU|md!N

0x0`0bn:b)t'v0心理学空间p]T {yw

Yo(_k3bh5X.e4X0SUMMARY

`:u7Cre}|6d0

)L2D/@!B8nn i5D)D0Early studies of intuitive judgment and decision makingconducted with the late Amos Tversky are reviewed in thecontext of two related concepts: an analysis of accessibility, the ease with which thoughts come to mind; a distinction between effortless intuition and deliberate reasoning.Intuitive thoughts, like percepts, are highly accessible. Determinants and consequences of accessibility help explainthe central results of prospect theory, framing effects, theheuristic process of attribute substitution, and the characteristic biases that result from the substitution of nonextensional for extensional attributes. Variations in the accessibility of rules explain the occasional corrections of intuitivejudgments. The study of biases is compatible with a view ofintuitive thinking and decision making as generally skilledand successful.

-F7jZ8S2}W%hMm0心理学空间*Y d$Qv^r;W\

http://pages.pomona.edu/~rt004747/lgcs11read/Kahneman03.pdf

*W(`I7` cj:mp0www.psychspace.com心理学空间网
TAG: Kahneman
«两个大脑在运转,一个快一个慢 Daniel Kahneman 丹尼尔·卡尼曼
《Daniel Kahneman 丹尼尔·卡尼曼》
A proposal to deal with questions about priming effects»