拉康的三界论是重要的理论核心,但关于三界的“周全”说法似乎不常见。在一本研究拉康的书中偶得不错的说明,分享如下。(原文为由法语转译而来的英文,在此笔者试译为汉语,不当之处请方家指正)
P11. Lacan & Human Science.edited by Alexander Leupin.1991
1.TheSymbolicis a closed systerm of differences. As the law of signification, in its purified form, to mathematical lauguge. It corresponds approximately to Freud`s superego and is the ground for discernibility and difference.
象征界是一个分化的封闭系统。作为意义的法则,可以化约为数学的语言。它大约相当于弗洛伊德“超我”的概念,而且是区分和分化的前提。
2.TheImaginaryis the systerm of projections and identifications; it displaces the Freudian ego and is defined by its intersubjective specularity. it is the grounding for binary mode of similarity and dissimilarity and the dialectics of intersubjectivity.
想象界是投射与认同的系统,它取代了弗洛伊德“自我”的概念,并由主体间的特殊性所界定。想象界是主体间性的相似与相异之二元性,及其辩证过程的基础。
3.TheReal, taking the position of Freud`s unconscious, must not be confused with the classical concept of "reality". which Lacan identifies with our phenomenological perception and with thus depends on the imaginary. the only possible defination of therealis that it is "impossible" to be defined and fomalized.
实在界取代了弗洛伊德“无意识”的概念,决不能与通常的所谓“真实”的概念相混淆。后者在拉康看来是我们现象学的感知,因此属于想象界。关于实在界唯一可能的定义就是它事实上是不能被界定和命名的。
——————————————
一点感受——
1.窃以为,拉康的三界理论跟英国科学哲学家波普尔的“三个世界”的划分有平行之处。