拉康哲学的问题式
作者: 张一兵 Zhang Yibing
内容提要:本文第一次从哲学的视角讨论了拉康哲学的深层问题式。作者首先提炼出拉康逻辑的两个重要学术构件:一是否定性关系本体逻辑,二是证伪性存在论。然后重点讨论了拉康哲学逻辑中颠倒海德格尔筹划论的他者篡位式、强暴式的伪先行性。最后,作者分析了拉康哲学的历史性语境,特别是他与学术支援背景的颠覆性关联。
关键词:拉康哲学 存在的不可能性 否定性本体论 先行性篡位
Abstract:This article has discussed the deep problematic of Lacan’s philosophy from the viewpoint of philosophy for the first time. At the beginning the writer extracts two important academic components of Lacan’s logic: one of them is the ontological logic of negative relationship, the other is falsifying existentialism. Then the writer focuses on the pseudo-antecedence of the other-usurping and the other-raping form in Heidegger’s theory of projection, which is overturned in Lacan’s philosophical logic. Finally, the writer makes an analysis of the historical context of Lacan’s philosophy, especially his subversive relations with his academic subsidiary background.
Key Words: Lacan’s philosophy the impossibility of being negative ontology
antecedent usurpation
拉康(Jacques-Marie-Emile-Lacan 1901-1983)是当代法国著名的精神分析学家和魔幻式的原创性思想大家。在今天这个后现代语境中,他的学术影响似乎一天天增大起来。其实,拉康的思想属于他活着的那个地方和时代。我以为,理解拉康的入门钥匙倒不是对拉康文本的独立解析,而在于首先懂得他所思考和解决的问题式之历史性缘起。这一点,对于费解的拉康真是太重要了。这也就是说,拉康哲学的难解性主要不是话语的玄虚,而在于他形上逻辑入口的非常性。通识话语中的大多数概念在拉康这里几乎都转喻性的。
一